About
EarthCape Oy has built collection and monitoring systems for natural history institutions since 2011. Herbaria, national museums, botanic gardens, and long-term monitoring programmes.
The mobile app is part of that work. We decided to release it to everyone rather than only to our customers, and that meant making it stand completely on its own: no account, no server behind it, and every function working with no signal.
What it carries is what the institutional side carries. The same data model, the same protocols, the same export formats. Nothing was cut down on the way out.
Why it matters later
A survey is worth most on the day it can be set beside another one: the next site, the next season, the next decade. What makes that possible is that both records were shaped the same way. Nobody plans for a format to drift. It drifts anyway, because the notes that explain it stay with the person who wrote them, and people move on to other projects.
What comparison needs
Who builds it
EarthCape Oy has built collection and monitoring systems for natural history institutions since 2011. Herbaria, national museums, botanic gardens and long-term monitoring programmes run their data on our platform. Some of them hold collections. Some of them run nothing but surveys.
That second group is why this app exists in the form it does. A monitoring programme has no specimens to fall back on. All it has is the record made in the field, and whether that record can still be read in twenty years.
earthcape.com“This is an ambitious project which aims to bring all of our collections data into one integrated system. A new software system (‘Earthcape’) has been purchased, and work is continuing on transition of our various sets of data into the new system.”
How it fits together
Records made in the app are already in the shape the next step expects, so nothing has to be translated on the way. This is the path institutions pay to build. If you are working on your own, you use the first box and export straight out of it — nothing about the app depends on the rest of it existing.
Whose format is it
The biodiversity community spent years agreeing how to describe an occurrence, a survey and the effort behind it. Those agreements already exist, they are public, and they are what the app writes. Nothing here is ours to claim.
The practical effect is that a record leaves the app already saying what it is, in terms a museum, a monitoring agency and a repository all read the same way.
We are not finished. Humboldt coverage is fifteen terms today and there are more worth carrying, and the archive is written around occurrences where it should be written around events. Both are on the list. We would rather tell you where the edges are than let you find them.
Read the documentationIn the build you can install today
Why it is free
The app works offline, has no accounts and no servers behind it, so a second user costs us nothing. Keeping it inside institutional contracts would have put it in the hands of a few hundred people. There was no good reason to do that.
There is a plainer reason too. Records that arrive already in a shared shape are records nobody has to translate. That is worth more to us than a fee would be, and it is the whole of our interest here. We would rather say so than have you wonder.
What that means for your data
What professional means here
Every claim on this page is checkable against the build in the store. There is no separate, better version of the app that institutions get.
What an institution runs on top of it is the rest of the chain: curation, permissions, reporting, loans. The recording end is the app you install, and it is complete.
In the build you can install today
Getting in touch
If something here does not match what you find in the app, we would rather hear about it than not.
The other end of the chain
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew runs EarthCape over its collections. This is the work a field record travels into.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Film by Visual Air.